Association Between Oral Health and Gastric Cancer in Korean Adults

Article information

Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2024;24(4):346-352
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 September 5
doi : https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0045
Sang Hoon Lee1,*orcid_icon, Hyunseok Cho2,*orcid_icon, Sung Chul Park,1orcid_icon, Sang Hoon Kim3orcid_icon, Seung Young Kim4orcid_icon, Han Jo Jeon4orcid_icon, Sang Pyo Lee5orcid_icon, Younghee Choe6orcid_icon, the Metabolism, Obesity, and Nutrition Research Group of the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research
1Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
2Department of Pediatrics, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
3Department of Internal Medicine, Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
4Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
5Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
6Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
Corresponding author Sung Chul Park, MD, PhD Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, 156 Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon 24289, Korea E-mail: schlp@hanmail.net
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received 2024 June 18; Revised 2024 July 16; Accepted 2024 July 25.

Abstract

Objectives

Poor oral hygiene is known to be associated with gastric cancer, but this remains controversial. In this study, we investigated the association between oral health and gastric cancer in Korean adults using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Methods

We analyzed data of 79501 patients with gastric cancer and 41856805 individuals without gastric cancer (control group) using the 7th and 8th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016–2019) records. Layer and colony variables and weights were used for the complex sample design. We performed logistic regression analysis of complex samples to analyze factors that affect gastric cancer development.

Results

Patients with gastric cancer were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes and a higher rate of current smoking and alcohol consumption than individuals without gastric cancer (p<0.001). Regarding oral health-related factors, the prevalence of very uncomfortable chewing difficulty was significantly higher in patients with gastric cancer (14.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis of factors associated with gastric cancer, chewing difficulty showed the highest odds ratio (5.351, 95% confidence interval 2.128–8.982). Patients with very uncomfortable chewing difficulty had high rates of previous dental nerve treatment, gum disease treatment, tooth extraction or intraoral surgery, and prosthetic repair (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Oral health-related chewing difficulties were associated with gastric cancer, which may be attributable to poor oral hygiene and degradation of oral microbiota. Patients at risk of gastric cancer warrant timely medical interventions to address their oral health and chewing difficulties.

INTRODUCTION

Based on the World Health Organization records, cancer was the leading cause of death among people aged 30–70 in 183 countries worldwide in 2019 [1]. The increasing importance of cancer as a primary cause of death is partially established by the significant decrease in mortality rates associated with stroke and coronary heart disease compared with those associated with cancer in many countries globally [1]. Gastric cancer is widely prevalent and was ranked the fifth most common cancer worldwide in 2020 [2]. The cancer survival rate in Korea has significantly increased owing to early detection facilitated by the National Cancer Screening Program. However, based on the Korea Central Cancer Registry data, gastric cancer was the fourth most common new cancer in 2021, following thyroid, colon, and lung cancers [3]. Gastric cancer is significantly associated with individual genetic predisposition as well as environmental factors, such as Helicobacter pylori infection and diet including consumption of excessive salt, salt-preserved foods, and nitroso compounds; therefore, identification of the causative factors can reduce gastric cancer incidence and mortality [4]. However, considering the current incidence of gastric cancer, some issues remain unclear even after control of known risk factors. For example, smoking is a significant risk factor for gastric cancer in high-income areas; however, it fails to adequately account for the high incidence of gastric cancer even in regions where smoking is uncommon [5]. Furthermore, H. pylori infection, a well-established risk factor for gastric cancer, is associated with only a relatively modest increase in risk in areas with high infection rates and high gastric cancer incidence [5]. These findings suggest that the etiology of gastric cancer may be associated with risk factors that currently remain unidentified.

Meanwhile, bacterial colonization in the oral cavity increases the risk of dental caries. Oral-origin gastric microbiota may be associated with gastric cancer development, and the possibility of an interaction between oral microbiota and H. pylori has been suggested [6]. Additionally, poor oral hygiene and H. pylori in the oral cavity are associated with dental caries [7-9]. Some reports suggest that poor oral hygiene is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer [7,10-13], although others do not report a significant association [14-17]. A domestic study did not observe any association between gastric neoplastic lesions, including adenomas and oral health [18]. However, this was a small-scale, single-center retrospective study. In contrast, a recent Korean study using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort reported that individuals with a history of chronic periodontitis may be at risk of developing gastric cancer [19].

Therefore, we investigated the association between oral health and gastric cancer in Korean adults using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), which serves as a useful indicator of the health status of Korean adults.

METHODS

Study design and data source

This cross-sectional study utilized data from the 7th and 8th KNHANES performed between 2016 and 2019. The KNHANES is a nationally representative survey that obtains information regarding the health and nutritional status of Korean citizens. In this study, we focused on adults diagnosed with gastric cancer, and our dataset included 79501 patients.

Participants and sample selection

Study participants were selected from the KNHANES records based on current diagnosis of gastric cancer. The inclusion criteria were adults aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with gastric cancer at the time of the survey. The control group consisted of individuals from the same dataset but without gastric cancer; the study included 41856805 participants.

Variables and data collection

The key variables analyzed in this study included demographic information (age and sex), health-related factors (body mass index [BMI], hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes), specific oral health indicators (chewing difficulties, oral health perception, and a history of dental treatments, among other variables) (Supplementary Table 1 in the online-only Data Supplement), and data regarding lifestyle practices, such as smoking and alcohol consumption. Current smoking was defined as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in one’s lifetime and currently continuing to smoke, and alcohol consumption was defined as consumption of alcohol more than once a month.

Complex sample design and weights

Considering the complex sample design of the KNHANES, layer and colony variables and sample weights were used to ensure accurate representativeness of the sample and account for the stratified multistage clustered probability design of the survey.

Statistical analysis

We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the association between each variable and gastric cancer, and multivariate logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders and determine the independent effect of oral health factors on gastric cancer. Therefore, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust meaningful variables observed on univariate analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to quantify the strength of associations. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software, ver. 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Review Board of Kangwon National University Hospital (approval number: KNUH-2023-11-005). Informed consent was not required owing to the retrospective nature of the study.

RESULTS

Demographic and health-related characteristics

Our analysis revealed significant demographic and health-related differences between individuals with and without gastric cancer. Patients with gastric cancer were older (mean age 62.6 years vs. 47.7 years, p<0.001) (Table 1). Although not statistically significant, there was a tendency for there to be more men in the gastric cancer group (52.8% vs. 49.7%, p=0.098). We observed no significant intergroup difference in BMI between the two groups (22.0 kg/m² vs. 24.0 kg/m², p=0.086). However, prevalence of hypertension (32.5% vs. 19.0%, p<0.001), hyperlipidemia (19.9% vs. 12.8%, p<0.001), and diabetes (20.0% vs. 7.6%, p<0.001) was higher in the gastric cancer group. We observed significant differences in lifestyle factors such as current smoking (53.0% vs. 40.6%, p<0.001) and alcohol consumption rates (51.1% vs. 22.2%, p<0.001).

Baseline characteristics of participants

Oral health-related factors

With regard to oral health, the prevalence of very uncomfortable chewing difficulty was higher in patients with gastric cancer than in the control group (14.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.001) (Table 1). We also observed significant differences in oral health-related variables, specifically in the rates of dental nerve treatment (15.9% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001), treatment for gum disease (16.5% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001), tooth extraction or intraoral surgery (14.7% vs. 9.9%, p<0.001), and creation or repair of dental prostheses (21.3% vs. 15.4%, p<0.001). Although statistically nonsignificant, self-perceived poor oral condition (poor or very poor) (8.0% vs. 7.4%, p=0.078), history of toothache in the preceding year (31.5% vs. 30.2%, p=0.060), and reasons for activity limitations (dental and oral issues) (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p=0.055) were more frequent in the gastric cancer group.

Logistic regression analysis

Table 2 shows the results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of factors associated with gastric cancer. We investigated the effects of age, sex (male), hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, current smoking, alcohol consumption, and oral health indicators, such as chewing difficulties, and self-perceived oral condition on gastric cancer. Age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, alcohol consumption, and chewing difficulties showed a trend (p<0.06) on univariate analysis and were subjected to multivariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the OR for chewing difficulties was significantly higher in the gastric cancer group (OR 5.351, 95% CI 2.128–8.982, p<0.001) (Table 2). Other factors such as age (OR 1.258, 95% CI 1.005–1.480, p<0.001), hypertension (OR 1.488, 95% CI 1.108–3.155, p<0.001), and diabetes (OR 1.830, 95% CI 1.125–3.721, p<0.001) were also significantly associated with gastric cancer.

Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with gastric cancer

Dental health treatment history

Patients with very uncomfortable chewing difficulties had a significantly higher rate of previous dental nerve treatment (5.7% vs. 3.1%, p<0.001), gum disease treatment (6.8% vs. 2.8%, p<0.001), tooth extraction or intraoral surgery (7.4% vs. 2.9%, p<0.001), and prosthetic repair (6.4% vs. 2.7%, p<0.001) compared with individuals without these issues (Table 3).

Association between chewing difficulties and dental health treatment

DISCUSSION

Based on analysis of the KNHANES data, we observed a significant association between poor oral health, specifically chewing difficulty and the prevalence of gastric cancer among Korean adults, in addition to known risk factors such as old age, hypertension, and diabetes. These results align with emerging research trends that have reported an association between oral health issues and various types of cancers [20-23]. However, a recent meta-analysis that analyzed periodontitis and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers observed no association between periodontitis and the risk of colorectal, gastric, or esophageal cancer [24]. In particular, Western studies have reported no correlation between oral health indicators such as tooth loss and upper GI cancer; however, this result may vary depending on differences in underlying risk factors for gastric cancer in the populations investigated [14-17]. In this regard, a meta-analysis of the association between tooth loss and gastric cancer revealed a stronger correlation in Asian than in European or American populations [25]. In addition, some related studies have included cancers other than gastric cancer, and these studies differ in their design and statistical analysis methods [14-17].

Among studies on oral health and cancer, few have specifically addressed functional aspects, such as chewing difficulties and cancer. A history of periodontal disease and tooth loss was associated with the risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma [26]. Tooth loss was associated with chewing difficulties [27], and a recent history of dental treatment was associated with chewing difficulties among older adults [28]. A longitudinal study showed that chewing difficulties were more likely to occur in individuals with tooth loss than in those without tooth loss [29]. Chewing, oral food transport, and swallowing are continuous processes [30]. The process of chewing affects the timing of food movement and initiation of swallowing [31]. The chewing ability can be evaluated with regard to “masticatory performance,” which is defined as the percentage of food particle size distribution when chewed a certain number of times [32]. Changes in masticatory performance were associated with non-ulcerative functional dyspepsia [33]. Dyspepsia is also one of the symptoms of gastric cancer, and symptoms of early-stage cancer may be indistinguishable from those of benign dyspepsia [34]. The clear correlation observed between poor oral health, specifically between chewing difficulties and gastric cancer is a novel aspect of this study.

We observed that patients with gastric cancer were usually older, had a higher incidence of comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes, and tended to be male, although this was not statistically significant. These demographic and health characteristics align with findings in the existing literature that describes risk factors for gastric cancer. Although there was no significant association in logistic regression analysis, the significant differences in current smoking status and alcohol consumption between the gastric cancer and non-gastric cancer groups also align with the fact that smoking and alcohol consumption are known risk factors for gastric cancer [35,36].

The association between poor oral health and gastric cancer can be explained by the following hypotheses. Poor oral hygiene favors bacterial colonization of the oral cavity, with a consequent increase in the nitrosamine (a carcinogen) levels that can potentially trigger development of gastric cancer [19-21]. Oral bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans may produce carcinogenic metabolites, which convert nitrates into nitrites [37]. Consequently, elevated nitrosamine levels may affect the incidence of gastric cancer. Furthermore, poor oral hygiene facilitates the proliferation of anaerobic bacteria, specifically, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola, in the oral cavity, leading to chronic inflammation such as periodontal disease [7,10,18]. Inflammatory molecules, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α are released in periodontal diseases such as periodontitis, which can promote the development and progression of gastric cancer [38,39]. In addition, patients with dental caries may develop H. pylori infection in the dental pulp, resulting in systemic H. pylori infection [6-9].

We also observed that patients with very uncomfortable chewing difficulties had higher rates of previous dental nerve treatment, gum disease treatment, tooth extraction or intraoral surgery, and prosthetic repair. This finding indicates that the physical manifestations of poor oral health, such as chewing difficulties, may represent clear and easily measurable markers of underlying pathogenetic contributors to cancer risk.

In light of these findings, considering oral health as a potential factor in gastric cancer screening and prevention strategies is necessary. The integration of oral health checkups into routine medical evaluation for individuals at risk for gastric cancer may be a proactive approach to identify and minimize this risk. Additionally, public health initiatives to improve oral hygiene and to address common dental issues may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of gastric cancer, particularly in high-risk populations.

Our study has some limitations. First, analysis of the KNHANES data showed that the number of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer was significantly smaller than that of patients without this diagnosis. Therefore, the generalizability of our results is debatable. Second, this study utilized data from the 7th and 8th KNHANES; therefore, we cannot ignore the possibility of unmeasured confounders that remained unaddressed, which may limit the applicability of the findings to other demographic groups. In particular, several previous studies have reported an association between oral disease and gastric cancer in terms of H. pylori and microbiota, as well as socioeconomic factors such as education and income [6-9]. However, the KNHANES data do not contain detailed information on various essential aspects, including H. pylori infection status, gastric cancer stage, histological differentiation, family history, and genetic and socioeconomic data. Therefore, our analysis did not adequately address the issue of missing data. Third, the KNHANES is a cross-sectional survey; therefore, establishing a causal association using this data is difficult. Further research and in-depth analyses are warranted to conclusively establish a correlation between gastric cancer and oral health.

In conclusion, this study enhances our understanding of the complex interplay between oral health issues, such as chewing difficulties, and gastric cancer. It emphasizes the potential of addressing poor oral health as a modifiable risk factor for gastric cancer, advocating a comprehensive approach to cancer prevention. Further research is necessary to gain deeper insight into the exact biological mechanisms underlying the association and to investigate the effectiveness of oral health interventions to reduce the risk of gastric cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0045.

Supplementary Table 1.

Oral health indicators included in the survey

kjhugr-2024-0045-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey website, [https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr].

Conflicts of Interest

Younghee Choe, a contributing editor of the Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, was not involved in the editorial evaluation or decision to publish this article. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by a 2024 Research Grant from Kangwon National University.

Authors’ Contribution

Conceptualization: Sang Hoon Lee, Sung Chul Park. Data curation: Sang Hoon Lee, Hyunseok Cho. Formal analysis: Hyunseok Cho. Investigation: Sang Hoon Lee, Hyunseok Cho, Sung Chul Park. Supervision: Sang Hoon Kim, Seung Young Kim, Han Jo Jeon, Sang Pyo Lee, Younghee Choe. Validation: all authors. Writing—original draft: Sang Hoon Lee, Hyunseok Cho. Writing—review & editing: Sung Chul Park. Approval of the final manuscript: all authors.

Acknowledgements

None

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, Soerjomataram I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer 2021;127:3029–3030.
2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–249.
3. Park SH, Kang MJ, Yun EH, Jung KW. Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Korea: trends in incidence and survival based on Korea central cancer registry data (1999-2019). J Gastric Cancer 2022;22:160–168.
4. Yusefi AR, Bagheri Lankarani K, Bastani P, Radinmanesh M, Kavosi Z. Risk factors for gastric cancer: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018;19:591–603.
5. Etemadi A, Safiri S, Sepanlou SG, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:42–54.
6. Bakhti SZ, Latifi-Navid S. Oral microbiota and Helicobacter pylori in gastric carcinogenesis: what do we know and where next? BMC Microbiol 2021;21:71.
7. Yano Y, Abnet CC, Poustchi H, et al. Oral health and risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers in a large prospective study from a high-risk region: Golestan cohort study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2021;14:709–718.
8. Iwai K, Azuma T, Yonenaga T, et al. Association between failed eradication of 7-day triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori and untreated dental caries in Japanese adults. Sci Rep 2024;14:4043.
9. Abdul NS, Khalid Alkhelaiwi A, Awadh Alenazi A, Fehaid Alrashidi R, Ghaleb Salma R. The association of Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity with dental caries in patients with and without gastric infection: a systematic review. Cureus 2023;15e38398.
10. Abnet CC, Qiao YL, Mark SD, Dong ZW, Taylor PR, Dawsey SM. Prospective study of tooth loss and incident esophageal and gastric cancers in China. Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:847–854.
11. Shakeri R, Malekzadeh R, Etemadi A, et al. Association of tooth loss and oral hygiene with risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6:477–482.
12. Abnet CC, Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Dong ZW, Taylor PR, Mark SD. Tooth loss is associated with increased risk of total death and death from upper gastrointestinal cancer, heart disease, and stroke in a Chinese population-based cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:467–474.
13. Zhang S, Yu P, Wang JB, Fan JH, Qiao YL, Taylor PR. Association between tooth loss and upper gastrointestinal cancer: a 30-year follow-up of the Linxian dysplasia nutrition intervention trial cohort. Thorac Cancer 2019;10:966–974.
14. Hiraki A, Matsuo K, Suzuki T, Kawase T, Tajima K. Teeth loss and risk of cancer at 14 common sites in Japanese. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:1222–1227.
15. Hujoel PP, Drangsholt M, Spiekerman C, Weiss NS. An exploration of the periodontitis-cancer association. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:312–316.
16. Michaud DS, Liu Y, Meyer M, Giovannucci E, Joshipura K. Periodontal disease, tooth loss, and cancer risk in male health professionals: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:550–558.
17. Jordão HW, McKenna G, McMenamin ÚC, Kunzmann AT, Murray LJ, Coleman HG. The association between self-reported poor oral health and gastrointestinal cancer risk in the UK Biobank: a large prospective cohort study. United European Gastroenterol J 2019;7:1241–1249.
18. Cha JH, Lee DW, Kim S, et al. Association between oral health and gastric neoplastic lesions. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2018;18:56–60.
19. Kwon MJ, Kang HS, Kim MJ, Kim NY, Choi HG, Lim H. Chronic periodontitis and the potential likelihood of gastric cancer: a nested case-control study in the Korean population utilizing a national health sample cohort. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:3974.
20. Lee K, Lee JS, Kim J, et al. Oral health and gastrointestinal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47:796–808.
21. Xuan K, Jha AR, Zhao T, Uy JP, Sun C. Is periodontal disease associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg 2021;19:50–61.
22. Bai X, Cui C, Yin J, et al. The association between oral hygiene and head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand 2023;81:374–395.
23. Mahuli AV, Sagar V, Kumar A, Mahuli SA, Kujur A. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the role of oral health as a risk factor in oral cancer. Cureus 2023;15e39786.
24. Zhang Y, Sun C, Song EJ, et al. Is periodontitis a risk indicator for gastrointestinal cancers? A meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47:134–147.
25. Yin XH, Wang YD, Luo H, et al. Association between tooth loss and gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 2016;11e0149653.
26. Lo CH, Kwon S, Wang L, et al. Periodontal disease, tooth loss, and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a prospective study. Gut 2021;70:620–621.
27. Jaber AA, Alshame AM, Abdalla KO, Natarajan PM. The association between teeth loss and oral health problems. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2021;15:1892–1902.
28. Kaewkamnerdpong I, Harirugsakul P, Prasertsom P, Vejvithee W, Niyomsilp K, Gururatana O. Oral status is associated with chewing difficulty in Thai older adults: data from a national oral health survey. BMC Oral Health 2023;23:35.
29. Gilbert GH, Meng X, Duncan RP, Shelton BJ. Incidence of tooth loss and prosthodontic dental care: effect on chewing difficulty onset, a component of oral health-related quality of life. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:880–885.
30. Palmer JB, Rudin NJ, Lara G, Crompton AW. Coordination of mastication and swallowing. Dysphagia 1992;7:187–200.
31. Saitoh E, Shibata S, Matsuo K, Baba M, Fujii W, Palmer JB. Chewing and food consistency: effects on bolus transport and swallow initiation. Dysphagia 2007;22:100–107.
32. Manly RS, Braley LC. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Dent Res 1950;29:448–462.
33. Carretero D, Sánchez-Ayala A, Rodriguez A, Lagravère MO, Gonçalves TM, Garcia RC. Relationship between non-ulcerative functional dyspepsia, occlusal pairs and masticatory performance in partially edentulous elderly persons. Gerodontology 2011;28:296–301.
34. Maconi G, Manes G, Porro GB. Role of symptoms in diagnosis and outcome of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:1149–1155.
35. Ma K, Baloch Z, He TT, Xia X. Alcohol consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit 2017;23:238–246.
36. Lee GB, Kim Y, Park S, Kim HC, Oh K. Obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia in Korean adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a special report of the 2020 Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. Epidemiol Health 2022;44e2022041.
37. Mirvish SS. Role of N-nitroso compounds (NOC) and N-nitrosation in etiology of gastric, esophageal, nasopharyngeal and bladder cancer and contribution to cancer of known exposures to NOC. Cancer Lett 1995;93:17–48.
38. Michaud DS, Fu Z, Shi J, Chung M. Periodontal disease, tooth loss, and cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 2017;39:49–58.
39. Vanoli A, Parente P, Fassan M, Mastracci L, Grillo F. Gut inflammation and tumorigenesis: every site has a different tale to tell. Intern Emerg Med 2023;18:2169–2179.

Article information Continued

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants

Variable Gastric cancer (n=79501) Non-gastric cancer (n=41856805) p-value
Age (yr) 62.6±1.9 47.7±0.2 <0.001
Sex, male 52.8 49.7 0.098
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.0±0.4 24.0±0.1 0.086
Hypertension 32.5 19.0 <0.001
Hyperlipidemia 19.9 12.8 <0.001
Diabetes 20.0 7.6 <0.001
Current smoking* 53.0 40.6 <0.001
Alcohol consumption 51.1 22.2 <0.001
Chewing difficulties (very uncomfortable) 14.4 3.6 <0.001
Self-perceived oral condition (poor or very poor) 8.0 7.4 0.078
History of one or more permanent tooth decay 96.5 97.8 0.086
Current permanent tooth decay 18.9 24.8 0.968
History of toothache in the preceding year 31.5 30.2 0.060
Reasons for activity limitations (dental and oral issues) 1.1 0.1 0.055
Dental nerve treatment 15.9 12.5 <0.001
Treatment for gum disease 16.5 12.5 <0.001
Treatment for simple cavities 15.7 15.5 0.806
Tooth extraction or intraoral surgery 14.7 9.9 <0.001
Creation or repair of dental prostheses 21.3 15.4 <0.001
Oral examination in the preceding year 38.1 36.0 0.501

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or percentage.

*

Current smoking refers to having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in one’s lifetime and currently continuing to smoke;

Alcohol consumption refers to consumption of alcohol more than once a month.

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with gastric cancer

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Age 1.024 (1.001–1.047) <0.001 1.258 (1.005–1.480) <0.001
Sex, male 1.392 (0.660–2.935) 0.051 1.422 (0.868–2.352) 0.059
Hypertension 2.049 (1.045–3.053) <0.001 1.488 (1.108–3.155) <0.001
Diabetes 2.917 (2.547–3.316) <0.001 1.830 (1.125–3.721) <0.001
Hyperlipidemia 1.252 (0.628–3.496) 0.955
Current smoking* 1.851 (0.513–6.680) 0.955
Alcohol consumption 1.897 (0.998–4.414) 0.058 2.412 (0.845–5.985) 0.070
Chewing difficulties (very uncomfortable) 3.756 (3.302–4.102) <0.001 5.351 (2.128–8.982) <0.001
Self-perceived oral condition (poor or very poor) 1.140 (0.270–4.812) 0.066
History of one or more permanent tooth decay 0.650 (0.101–4.030) 0.088
Current permanent tooth decay 0.705 (0.289–1.721) 0.968
History of toothache in the preceding year 1.124 (0.656–2.849) 0.078
Reasons for activity limitations (dental and oral issues) 2.186 (0.300–18.826) 0.531
Oral examination in the preceding year 0.853 (0.152–4.654) 0.712
*

Current smoking refers to having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in one’s lifetime and currently continuing to smoke;

Alcohol consumption refers to consumption of alcohol more than once a month.

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Table 3.

Association between chewing difficulties and dental health treatment

Dental health treatment Chewing difficulties (very uncomfortable) Others (without chewing difficulties) p-value
Dental nerve treatment 5.7 3.1 <0.001
Treatment for gum disease 6.8 2.8 <0.001
Treatment for simple cavities 3.5 3.8 0.085
Tooth extraction or intraoral surgery 7.4 2.9 <0.001
Creation or repair of dental prostheses 6.4 2.7 <0.001

Data are presented as percentage.