INTRODUCTION
Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is a chronic atrophic gastritis marked by immune-mediated destruction of parietal cells that causes oxyntic gland atrophy, achlorhydria, and secondary hypergastrinemia [
1,
2]. AIG commonly co-occurs with other autoimmune diseases, such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, type 1 diabetes, Addison’s disease, chronic spontaneous urticaria, myasthenia gravis, and vitiligo [
3]. Furthermore, it can be a precursor to a variety of gastrointestinal conditions, including gastric cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, and gastric polyps.
Physiologic alterations in AIG promote mucosal regeneration and intestinal metaplasia, thereby contributing to the development of gastric hyperplastic polyp (GHP). Although these lesions have historically been associated with chronic
Helicobacter pylori gastritis, accumulating evidence now indicates that AIG serves as an additional major etiologic factor [
4,
5]. While GHPs are typically regarded as benign, recent studies highlight that those related to AIG present unique clinicopathologic features, including multiple lesions, body-predominant distribution, and a heightened risk of dysplasia or carcinoma [
6]. AIG is infrequently documented in South Korea, especially in conjunction with GHPs. Here, we present two cases of AIG that were incidentally identified during management of GHP.
DISCUSSION
AIG is defined by chronic immune-mediated destruction of oxyntic glands, causing hypochlorhydria, hypergastrinemia, and subsequent reactive epithelial proliferation. This sequence accounts for the frequent development of GHPs in autoimmune backgrounds rather than in
H. pylori-associated atrophic gastritis [
4,
7]. Stolte [
8] reported that GHPs mainly develop in active and atrophic AIG, and subsequent studies have corroborated their frequent association with pernicious anemia and gastrin-mediated mucosal regeneration. Therefore, GHPs should be considered not only a benign reactive manifestation but also a visible indicator of the autoimmune milieu within the corpus mucosa.
In East Asia, the clinical identification of AIG remains difficult. Despite increased disease awareness, standard screening endoscopy still primarily targets
H. pylori-associated gastritis. Corpus-dominant atrophy is frequently ascribed to past infection or normal aging, while systematic serologic assessments—including pepsinogen I/II ratio, fasting gastrin, and anti-parietal cell antibody testing—are rarely adopted in health-check protocols [
9,
10]. Consequently, many patients receive a diagnosis only after considerable mucosal damage or clinical evidence of nutritional deficiency has already occurred.
Multiple recent studies have described these diagnostic obstacles, consistently underscoring the lack of AIG detection, the limitations inherent in both endoscopic and serologic diagnostic approaches, and the potential for GHPs to undergo neoplastic transformation in autoimmune contexts.
Table 1 summarizes the principal findings from these key publications [
1,
4,
6,
10,
11].
A recent case report from China documented a GHP containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in an autoimmune setting, highlighting the carcinogenic risk linked to chronic AIG-driven mucosal changes [
6]. Upon AIG diagnosis, the potential for neoplastic progression—including adenocarcinoma and type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors—demands regular endoscopic monitoring and prompt management of iron and vitamin B12 deficiency.
In Case 1, pronounced corpus atrophy combined with elevated gastrin levels clearly indicated an autoimmune etiology; in contrast, Case 2 exhibited an antral lesion and comparatively mild body atrophy, which could readily be mistaken for non-specific chronic gastritis. Nevertheless, serologic assessment suggested hypochlorhydria and positive anti-parietal cell antibodies, supporting AIG as the etiology.
Although anti-intrinsic factor antibody is considered a specific marker for AIG, its diagnostic sensitivity is low, reported to be approximately 25%–30%, and positivity is more frequently observed in advanced or late-stage disease [
9,
12]. Therefore, a negative intrinsic factor antibody result does not exclude the diagnosis of AIG.
The serologic abnormalities observed in some patients, such as profoundly reduced pepsinogen I/II ratios and markedly elevated serum gastrin levels, may warrant closer evaluation for vitamin B12 and iron deficiency and more intensive monitoring. However, serologic markers are influenced by multiple factors, including the extent of gastric atrophy, residual acid output,
Helicobacter pylori status, and proton pump inhibitor use. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to reliably infer an individual patient’s disease duration or precise disease stage from specific serologic cutoff values [
13].
Current evidence supports a comprehensive diagnostic approach incorporating anti-parietal cell antibodies, endoscopic findings, histopathologic features of oxyntic gland atrophy, and serologic biomarkers such as pepsinogen levels and serum gastrin [
12]. This comparison demonstrates that AIG can manifest across a broad morphological range—from substantial atrophy to only slight mucosal alteration—and underscores the importance of integrating serologic and endoscopic findings for accurate diagnosis.
Furthermore, Chen et al. [
14] have recently advanced the understanding of AIG by characterizing the endoscopic features associated with early-stage disease in patients who do not display visible atrophy. The investigators identified yellowishwhite cobblestone-like elevations and irregular collecting venules located in the gastric body, which histologically correspond to pseudo-hypertrophy of parietal cells and G-cell hyperplasia. These observations demonstrate that AIG can be detected prior to the development of atrophy, emphasizing the clinical importance of recognizing such subtle endoscopic findings during standard screening [
14]. Integrating these early morphologic indicators in conjunction with serologic assessment may help reduce delayed diagnosis and facilitate earlier identification of AIG.
In this context, the present cases add to the accumulating evidence that GHPs identified in H. pylori-negative, body-predominant atrophic mucosa should raise suspicion for underlying autoimmune pathology. Accordingly, when an endoscopist observes a GHP within atrophic gastric body mucosa, a systematic approach involving H. pylori testing, consideration of AIG if negative, followed by serum biomarker analysis and targeted biopsy of the gastric body, could limit underdiagnosis and facilitate prompt detection of precancerous changes.
AIG represents a distinct pathophysiologic basis for body atrophy that frequently remains unrecognized in routine clinical practice. The two cases described herein indicate that the presence of small hyperplastic gastric polyps confined to body atrophic mucosa, absent H. pylori infection, may function as an observable surrogate marker for underlying AIG.
Endoscopists are encouraged to thoroughly evaluate corpus-dominant atrophic changes and consider relevant serologic tests—including pepsinogen profile, gastrin, and anti-parietal cell antibody—whenever GHPs are detected in this context. Improving awareness of both classic and subtle presentations of early-stage AIG may enhance diagnostic precision and support optimal long-term follow-up for this frequently underdiagnosed disorder.