A Subepithelial Lesion of the Stomach Observed During Screening Endoscopy

Article information

Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2025;25(3):302-304
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 September 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0041
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
Corresponding author Yonghoon Choi, MD Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea E-mail: 89796@snubh.org
Received 2025 June 26; Revised 2025 July 1; Accepted 2025 June 4.

Question

A 44-year-old male presented with an asymptomatic gastric subepithelial lesion (SEL), detected incidentally during a screening endoscopy. The lesion was a round mass measuring approximately 1.5 cm, located on the greater curvature of the fundus of the stomach. Although the overlying mucosa mainly appeared intact, the center of the lesion showed hyperemic and erosive changes (Fig. 1). A biopsy of the overlying mucosa revealed Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis; however, it was non-diagnostic because the submucosal layer was not included. Follow-up evaluations at 4 and 12 months showed no change in the lesion size; however, erosion in the surface mucosa progressed further, resulting in ulcerative changes (Fig. 2). Additional diagnostic workup and surgical resection were planned, considering the patient’s age and persistent erosive changes in the overlying mucosa. A computed tomography scan confirmed a 1.5 cm SEL in the fundus of the stomach (Fig. 3), with no evidence of invasion into adjacent organs or lymph node metastasis. As surgical resection had already been decided, endoscopic ultrasonography was not performed. What was the most likely diagnosis?

Fig. 1.

Initial endoscopic findings of the lesion. A 1.5 cm subepithelial lesion with central erosive change (white arrowhead) was located on the greater curvature of the gastric fundus.

Fig. 2.

Endoscopic findings at the 4- (A) and 12-month (B) follow-ups. The size of the lesion remained unchanged, and the central erosive change (white arrowheads) persisted without any alteration.

Fig. 3.

CT scan before surgical treatment. A and B: The CT scan confirmed a 1.5 cm subepithelial lesion in the fundus of the stomach (white circles), with no evidence of distant metastasis.

Answer

The lesion was removed via laparoscopic gastric wedge resection, and final histopathological examination revealed early gastric cancer (EGC; tubular adenocarcinoma, well-differentiated, stage pT1a, with invasion confined to the muscularis mucosa) occurring against a background of gastritis cystica profunda (Fig. 4). The lesion, measuring 2×2×1 mm, was observed within the mucosal layer at a site separate from the surface mucosal defect. The lesion, including both gastritis cystica profunda and adenocarcinoma, was completely resected surgically, and the patient is currently under follow-up without the need for additional treatment.

Fig. 4.

Final histopathological findings. A: Representative section of the mass, clearly demonstrating features of gastritis cystica profunda showing elongated, tortuous foveolae and cystically dilated underlying pyloric gland (blue circle) and the most prominent defect in the surface mucosa (H&E, ×40). B and C: Tubular adenocarcinoma (2×2×1 mm), well-differentiated, located apart from the area of mucosal defect, with invasion confined to the muscularis mucosa (red circle) (H&E, ×20 and ×100). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Gastritis cystica profunda is a relatively rare condition characterized by cystic dilatation of benign gastric glands with submucosal extension [1]. It was previously known as a relatively rare lesion that typically develops in patients with a history of gastroenterostomy, especially for treating benign conditions such as gastric ulcers. However, more recent reports have described its occurrence in the stomachs of patients without any history of gastric surgery [2]. Gastritis cystica profunda is often presented as a polyp or SEL incidentally found on endoscopy, and diagnosis is challenging based on endoscopic appearance and biopsy. Therefore, it is typically diagnosed after endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgical resection [3]. Endoscopically, gastritis cystica profunda is known to be highly variable. It most commonly presents as a polypoid or SEL; however, rare cases of giant gastric folds have been reported. The most characteristic endoscopic ultrasound finding is the presence of multiple anechoic cystic lesions in the submucosal layer [4].

In the present case, surgical resection was performed based on the gross endoscopic appearance, specifically, the erosive changes of the overlying mucosa, raising suspicion of an SEL with size increment and malignant potential [5], such as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. However, contrary to the initial impression, the lesion was diagnosed as EGC arising from gastritis cystica profunda. Although gastritis cystica profunda is generally considered a benign condition, there are cases of malignancy near or arising from the overlying mucosa of such lesions [2,6-8]. Furthermore, recent studies have suggested the possibility of underlying molecular genetic alterations associated with the development of gastritis cystica profunda [9]. Therefore, when encountering a SEL with atypical features, clinicians should be mindful of the possibility of gastritis cystica profunda and associated mucosal neoplasia.

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

The necessary data have been included in the manuscript and figure.

Conflicts of Interest

Yonghoon Choi, a contributing editor of the Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, was not involved in the editorial evaluation or decision to publish this article.

Funding Statement

None

Acknowledgements

None

Ethics Statement

The paper was written with the patient’s consent obtained.

References

1. Koga S, Watanabe H, Enjoji M. Stomal polypoid hypertrophic gastritis: a polypoid gastric lesion at gastroenterostomy site. Cancer 1979;43:647–657.
2. Park CH, Park JM, Jung CK, et al. Early gastric cancer associated with gastritis cystica polyposa in the unoperated stomach treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:e47–e50.
3. Jang J, Choi CW. Subepithelial tumor diagnosed after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2022;22:317–320.
4. Machicado J, Shroff J, Quesada A, et al. Gastritis cystica profunda: endoscopic ultrasound findings and review of the literature. Endosc Ultrasound 2014;3:131–134.
5. Kim B, Kang S, Lee E, et al. Gastric subepithelial tumor: long-term natural history and risk factors for progression. Surg Endosc 2022;36:5232–5242.
6. Jo MA, Kim SH, Kim SH, et al. A case of gastritis cystica profunda with early gastric cancer. Korean J Med 2004;67:78–82.
7. Ogasawara N, Noda H, Kondo Y, et al. A case of early gastric cancer arising from gastritis cystica profunda treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2014;8:270–275.
8. Eriksson Y, Nakamoto M, Orita H, Miyahira T, Aoyama H, Hokama A. Early gastric cancer concurrent with gastritis cystica profunda resembling advanced cancer. Chonnam Med J 2024;60:87–88.
9. Itami H, Morita K, Nakai T, et al. Gastritis cystica profunda is associated with aberrant p53 and Epstein-Barr virus in gastric cancer: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization study. Pathol Int 2021;71:42–50.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Initial endoscopic findings of the lesion. A 1.5 cm subepithelial lesion with central erosive change (white arrowhead) was located on the greater curvature of the gastric fundus.

Fig. 2.

Endoscopic findings at the 4- (A) and 12-month (B) follow-ups. The size of the lesion remained unchanged, and the central erosive change (white arrowheads) persisted without any alteration.

Fig. 3.

CT scan before surgical treatment. A and B: The CT scan confirmed a 1.5 cm subepithelial lesion in the fundus of the stomach (white circles), with no evidence of distant metastasis.

Fig. 4.

Final histopathological findings. A: Representative section of the mass, clearly demonstrating features of gastritis cystica profunda showing elongated, tortuous foveolae and cystically dilated underlying pyloric gland (blue circle) and the most prominent defect in the surface mucosa (H&E, ×40). B and C: Tubular adenocarcinoma (2×2×1 mm), well-differentiated, located apart from the area of mucosal defect, with invasion confined to the muscularis mucosa (red circle) (H&E, ×20 and ×100). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.