Eosinophilic Esophagitis: No Longer a Rarity in Asia—A Growing Concern for Clinicians

Article information

Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2025;25(2):96-97
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 June 4
doi : https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0027
Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author Kee Wook Jung, MD, PhD Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea E-mail: jung.keewook30@gmail.com
Received 2025 April 16; Accepted 2025 April 29.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)—a chronic, immune-mediated disease—is characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal epithelium, leading to symptoms, such as dysphagia and food impaction. While the prevalence of EoE is well documented in Western populations, data from Asian countries, including Korea, have historically been sparse [1]. Furthermore, changing in diagnostic criteria over the past decades have posed challenges to the longitudinal assessments of its epidemiology [2].

Recent studies have suggested an increasing diagnostic trend of EoE in Korea [3-5]. In a retrospective analysis conducted between 2006 and 2016, only a modest increase was observed in the number of esophageal biopsies; however, the number of EoE diagnoses rose significantly over the same period (p<0.001) [3]. Comparable trends have also been documented in other regions of Korea, including Busan and Gyeongnam [6].

Evidence from neighboring Asian countries further substantiates this increasing recognition. A recent nationwide Japanese study, using International Classification of Disease-coded data, demonstrated that the incidence and prevalence of EoE in 2022 were 2.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44–3.26) and 10.68 (95% CI, 10.01–11.37) per 100000 person-years, respectively, reflecting almost threefold and eightfold increases compared to 2017 [7].

Moreover, a recent meta-analysis of Asian studies revealed a significant upward trend in both prevalence and incidence over time.8 Between 2005–2009 and 2015–2019, population-based prevalence rose from 19.8 (95% CI, 19.5–20.1) to 73.0 (95% CI, 72.8–73.2) per 100000 person-years [8].

Taken together, these findings underscore that EoE is no longer a rare entity in Asia. With increasing diagnostic awareness and rising case numbers, the burden of EoE is becoming more apparent, especially for gastroenterologists in Korea.

In this issue, a comprehensive review article titled “Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Emerging Insights Into Diagnosis and Management [9]” offers an up-to-date synthesis of current knowledge. The review discusses state-of-the-art diagnostic tools, therapeutic approaches, including dietary strategies, pharmacologic agents, and endoscopic interventions, and highlights emerging biologic therapies. Importantly, it emphasizes the requirement for a unified diagnostic framework and optimal treatment algorithms to address this increasingly recognized and clinically significant disease.

Notes

Availability of Data and Material

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

None

Acknowledgements

None

References

1. Dellon ES, Hirano I. Epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology 2018;154:319–332.e3.
2. Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, et al. Updated international consensus diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: proceedings of the AGREE conference. Gastroenterology 2018;155:1022–1033.e10.
3. Kim GH, Park YS, Jung KW, et al. An increasing trend of eosinophilic esophagitis in Korea and the clinical implication of the biomarkers to determine disease activity and treatment response in eosinophilic esophagitis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019;25:525–533.
4. Park K, Ahn B, Jung KW, et al. Optimal diagnostic and treatment response threshold of the eosinophilic esophagitis endoscopic reference score: a single-center study of 102 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024;30:430–436.
5. Kim GH, Jung KW, Jung HY, et al. Diagnostic trends and clinical characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis: a Korean, single-center database study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018;24:248–254.
6. Kim SJ, Park MI, Kim GH, et al. Practice patterns for eosinophilic esophagitis patients in Busan and Gyeongnam: a Korean multicenter database study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;27:71–77.
7. Sawada A, Imai T, Ihara Y, Tanaka F, Hirano I, Fujiwara Y. Epidemiology and risk factors of eosinophilic esophagitis in Japan: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024;22:2023–2032. e6.
8. Leung R, Yeung MLC, Li Y, Muftah M, Chan WW, Leung WK. Temporal trend of incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2025;120:320–331.
9. Choi HH. Eosinophilic esophagitis: emerging insights into diagnosis and management. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2025;25:117–125.

Article information Continued