Korean J Helicobacter  Up Gastrointest Res Search


Korean J Helicobacter  Up Gastrointest Res > Volume 22(4); 2022 > Article
Lee: Comparison of Gastric Cancer Screening Strategies between Helicobacter pylori-infected, -eradicated, and -naive Individuals
The National Cancer Screening Program still recommends biennial gastric cancer screening to all Koreans aged between 40 and 74 years [1]. A total of 6,916,632 (55.7%) Koreans underwent gastric cancer screening among the target population of 12,409,918 in 2020 [2]. According to the data, most (90.8%) underwent gastroscopy in 2020. Only 9.2% underwent upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS). Although endoscopic screening decreased gastric cancer-related mortality in Koreans [3], the current strategy needs to be revised for the following reasons. First, the age-standardized incidence rate of gastric cancer has decreased by 4.6% per year since 2011, reaching 30.4 per 100,000 population in 2019 [4]. Second, the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-seropositivity is decreasing [5]. It was 74.3% in 1990, but decreased to 43.9% in 2016. Third, among seronegative subjects, past infection is common only in elderly Koreans born before 1960 [6]. In other words, H. pylori-naive stomachs are common in the younger population born thereafter. Lastly, the type and location of gastric cancers differ between H. pylori-infected, -eradicated, and -naive individuals (Fig. 1). Hence, different strategies should be considered instead of performing biennial gastroscopy in all Koreans aged ≥40.
Besides gastroscopy and UGIS, several methods have been suggested for gastric cancer screening. Nonetheless, no large-sized studies have reported significant decreases in gastric cancer-related mortality in Koreans, except for studies using gastroscopy. Non-invasive H. pylori tests, including the serology test, are also mentioned; however, these tests cannot diagnose gastric cancer itself. Similarly, a combination of serology titers and serum pepsinogen (PG) tests cannot detect gastric cancer, but it helps detecting high-risk individuals for gastric cancers and adenomas [7]. Low PG I/II ratios indicate an increased risk for gastric adenoma and intestinal-type cancer, and high PG II levels indicate that for diffuse-type gastric cancer [8]. Furthermore, a low PG I/II ratio and a high PG II level help discriminate current H. pylori infection [9]. The study showed that low PG I/II ratios below 4.35 and high PG II levels over 12.95 ng/mL correlated with a positive urea breath test (UBT) finding in asymptomatic Koreans (sensitivity: 91.6%, specificity: 94.3%).
To diagnose H. pylori infection, serum assay findings should be interpreted together with gastroscopy findings of the background mucosa and other H. pylori tests. When current H. pylori infection is suspected, either a positive UBT, monoclonal H. pylori stool antigen test or invasive test finding is required for confirmation (Fig. 2). If there is an infection, primary prevention (H. pylori eradication) should be achieved before recommending secondary prevention (biennial endoscopic screening) for gastric cancer [10].
After eradication, confirmation should be done using UBT or a monoclonal-type stool antigen test because they show high specificities (UBT: 97.9~100%, stool test: 97.0~100%) and sensitivities (UBT: 97.7~100%, stool test: 96.0~100%) among all H. pylori tests [11]. Conversely, invasive H. pylori tests should be avoided because endoscopic biopsies often show false negative findings [12]. Although serum assays are not used for eradication confirmation, PG II levels and serology titers start to decrease within a few months after successful eradication [13]. Moreover, PG I/II ratios start to increase several months after eradication unless severe gastric corpus atrophy is present [14]. These changes are more profound in younger eradicated patients than in older patients with atrophy [15]. Furthermore, PG levels increase in renal failure patients and after the use of certain drugs, including aspirin and acid suppressants. Conversely, PG levels decrease after gastrectomy owing to the loss of chief cells. Altogether, it should be kept in mind that there is a wide variation in PG levels among individuals.
Past infection can be diagnosed if there is an eradication history, intestinal metaplasia, or atrophy (including gastric corpus atrophy as measured by a PG I/II ratio ≤3.0 and PG I level ≤70 ng/mL) (Fig. 2). The risk of gastric cancer is higher in eradicated patients than in H. pylori-naive individuals; hence, biennial gastroscopy is recommended. In a recent Korean study, gastroscopy decreased gastric cancer-related death, with a hazard ratio of 0.57 when screening endoscopy was performed within ≤23 months [16].
H. pylori-naive individuals show the lowest risk of gastric cancer among all infection statuses [17]. In their study, 1,378 (75.2%) of 1,833 Korean gastric cancer patients had current infection, 412 (22.5%) had a past infection, and 43 (2.3%) had no infection history. As summarized in Fig. 1, neuroendocrine tumors and other rare H. pylori-negative gastric cancers may occur in H. pylori-naive stomachs. Precancerous conditions for neuroendocrine tumors are autoimmune gastritis [18] and hypergastrinemia induced by a long-term intake of a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) [19]. Unlike histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, PPI and P-CAB induce hypersecretion of gastrin and PG [20]. Therefore, serum gastrin levels should be monitored when PPI or P-CAB is administered for a long time.
In summary, gastric cancer screening methods should vary according to H. pylori infection status because the risks and characteristics of gastric cancers differ among H. pylori-infected, -eradicated, and -naive individuals. The current strategy using biennial gastroscopy should be recommended only to individuals with an infection history. When there is an infection, H. pylori should be eradicated first, and confirmation should be followed using UBT or a monoclonal stool antigen test. Furthermore, monitoring serum gastrin levels would be helpful to H. pylori-naive subjects when administrating acid suppressants. To implement these different strategies, Korean endoscopists should be aware of serum assay and gastroscopy findings that indicate H. pylori-infected, -eradicated, and -naive stomachs. Additional training on diagnosing H. pylori infection status is required for all endoscopists engaged in gastric cancer screening.


This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF2016R 1D1A1B02008937).


No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Common sites and types of gastric cancer. H. pylori-negative cancer usually occurs in the proximal stomach, except for signet ring cell carcinoma, a subtype of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma. In contrast, cancer in an infected stomach tends to occur in the vicinity of the gastric folds, and these cancers are primarily diffuse-type lesions. Early-stage cancer presents as a pale, flat (IIb) superficial lesion. Advanced-stage disease is often diagnosed as Borrmann type IV cancer that invades deep into the submucosa. Conversely, most cancers in stomachs with previous or chronic infection are less invasive intestinal-type carcinomas that occur in atrophic or metaplastic mucosa. Early-stage cancer presents as an elevated (IIa) or depressed (IIc)-type superficial lesion. Advanced-stage lesions show an ulcerated and infiltrated appearance, indicative of Borrmann type III cancer. H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; EGC, early gastric cancer; AGC, advanced gastric cancer; PG, pepsinogen.
Fig. 2.
Confirmation of the H. pylori infection status. Serum assays cannot confirm H. pylori infection, and invasive tests, a monoclonal-type stool antigen test, or the urea breath test is performed for confirmation. Previous infection is considered in patients in whom these tests show negative findings. Past infection is diagnosed based on a history of eradication, atrophy, or IM. An H. pylori-naive stomach is diagnosed in patients who do not show any of these findings. Serum gastrin and pepsinogen I levels are monitored in H. pylori-naive individuals who receive long-term potassium-competitive acid blockers or proton pump inhibitors. The Kyoto classification score is 0 in H. pylori-naive stomachs, except in patients with H. pylori-naive autoimmune gastritis, who may show scores between 2 and 4 (A2IM0-2H0N0DR0). Atrophy is scored 0 (none or atrophy limited to the antrum), 1 (atrophy confined to the lesser curvature of the gastric body without cardiac involvement), and 2 (atrophy with invasion of the cardia). IM is scored 0 (absent), 1 (limited IM confined to the antrum), and 2 (extensive IM). Atrophy and IM may be observed both in stomachs with H. pylori infection and eradication. In contrast, diffuse redness, hypertrophic folds, and nodularity tend to occur only in infected stomachs. Diffuse redness is scored 0 (absent), 1 (mild), and 2 (severe). Hypertrophic folds and nodularity are scored 0 (absent) and 1 (present). H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; IM, intestinal metaplasia; PG, pepsinogen; A, atrophy; H, hypertrophic rugae; N, nodular gastritis; DR, diffuse redness.


1. Park HA, Nam SY, Lee SK, et al. The Korean guideline for gastric cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58:373–384.
2. Korean Statistical Information Service. Gastric cancer screening statistics [Internet]. Daejeon: korean Statistical Information Service; 2022. [cited 2022 Sep 1]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=350&tblId=DT_35007_N011&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=350_35007_A002&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE.

3. Jun JK, Choi KS, Lee HY, et al. Effectiveness of the Korean national cancer screening program in reducing gastric cancer mortality. Gastroenterology 2017;152:1319–1328; e7.
crossref pmid
4. Kang MJ, Won YJ, Lee JJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2019. Cancer Res Treat 2022;54:330–344.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Lim SH, Kim N, Kwon JW, et al. Trends in the seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and its putative eradication rate over 18 years in Korea: a cross-sectional nationwide multicenter study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0204762.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Kwon H, Lee SY, Kim JH, et al. ABC classification is less useful for older Koreans born before 1960. Gut Liver 2019;13:522–530.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Choi HS, Lee SY, Kim JH, et al. Combining the serum pepsinogen level and Helicobacter pylori antibody test for predicting the histology of gastric neoplasm. J Dig Dis 2014;15:293–298.
crossref pmid
8. Baek SM, Kim N, Kwon YJ, et al. Role of serum pepsinogen II and Helicobacter pylori status in the detection of diffuse-type early gastric cancer in young individuals in South Korea. Gut Liver 2020;14:439–449.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Jeong JH, Lee SY, Kim JH, Sung IK, Park HS. Useful serum pepsinogen levels for detecting ongoing Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic subjects: a cross-sectional study based on 13C-urea breath test findings. Dig Dis Sci 2022. doi:10.1007/s10620-022-07471-2. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref pdf
10. Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, Li D. AGA clinical practice update on the diagnosis and management of atrophic gastritis: expert review. Gastroenterology 2021;161:1325–1332; e7.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Best LM, Takwoingi Y, Siddique S, et al. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD012080.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Kim JH, Lee SY, Lee SP, et al. The histologic detection of Helicobacter pylori in seropositive subjects is affected by pathology and secretory ability of the stomach. Helicobacter 2018;23:e12480.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Lee SY. Serum assay findings after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2021;21:287–299.
crossref pdf
14. Ohkusa T, Miwa H, Nomura T, et al. Improvement in serum pepsinogens and gastrin in long-term monitoring after eradication of Helicobacter pylori : comparison with H pylori-negative patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20 Suppl 1:25–32.
crossref pmid pdf
15. Haj-Sheykholeslami A, Rakhshani N, Amirzargar A, et al. Serum pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and gastrin 17 in relatives of gastric cancer patients: comparative study with type and severity of gastritis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:174–179.
crossref pmid
16. Luu XQ, Lee K, Jun JK, Suh M, Jung KW, Choi KS. Effect of gastric cancer screening on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients: results of Korean national cancer screening program. J Gastroenterol 2022;57:464–475.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Kwak HW, Choi IJ, Cho SJ, et al. Characteristics of gastric cancer according to Helicobacter pylori infection status. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:1671–1677.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Jeong JH, Lee SY, Han HS, Kim JH, Sung IK, Park HS. Five autoimmune gastritis patients with positive findings of serum anti-parietal cell antibodies. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2021;21:226–234.
crossref pdf
19. Rais R, Trikalinos NA, Liu J, Chatterjee D. Enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia-associated gastric neuroendocrine tumors may arise in the setting of proton pump inhibitor use. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022;146:366–371.
crossref pmid pdf
20. Agréus L, Storskrubb T, Aro P, Ronkainen J, Talley NJ, Sipponen P. Clinical use of proton-pump inhibitors but not H2-blockers or antacid/alginates raises the serum levels of amidated gastrin-17, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II in a random adult population. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009;44:564–570.
crossref pmid

Editorial Office
Lotte Gold Rose II Room 917, 31 Seolleung-ro 86-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06193, Korea
Tel: +82-2-717-5543    Fax: +82-2-565-9947    E-mail: helicojournal@smileml.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next